Chechar in his prime! This prose is what years ago made me admire him at once. Balancing on the edge of semi-distinct cultures, just as do I. Still, there are a few points up for clarification that I would discuss with him, were he honest enough to permit.
> “It is no coincidence that, until very recently, the Aryans have dominated culture, science, technology, and the political world.”
Here, Chechar is defining superiority as real achievement in the realm of survival and advancement compared to other races? And yet, later he writes,
> “Any honest Italian can see that the mixed people of Sicily with the Turks [sic!] in the south belong to an inferior culture than the whiter Italians in the north of the peninsula.”
How does this cohere to the previous definition of supremacy? How is the cucked death of the northerners congruent with their inherent superiority? Do I need to explain what untimely demise means?
Ah, but I know Chechar’s response – culture! Ditto. The potential of the Aryan is stifled by the incorrect religion. Yet if we take a memetic approach, where does the racist determinism remain? (Yes, our aircraft has the wrong fuel in its tanks, but there is no mechanic.)
This is an issue with such absolutist worldviews. True, natural racism (which Chechar goes on rightfully to praise) does not deal in Christian absolutes, it lives in love for its own kind, sufficiently so. Instinctive racism feels no need to prove itself – unless before Nature herself, when seeking more efficient ways to kill foreigners, the way it is in Juche Korea.
Overall, it is curious to behold this amusing contradiction between Chechar’s stance against biological psychiatry – preferring to focus on the content of the mind as opposed to its hardware – and his vindication of biological determinism vis-à-vis cultural evolution. Mildly schizophrenic. My position is – why not both? The struggle and unity of memes and genes. Simple Marxist Taoism.
> “Racismo (English racialism [sic!]…”
> “The superior race is the Aryan, which from the North spread in antiquity through Egypt, India, Persia, Greece and Rome, and produced the ancient civilisations: civilisations that declined because the Aryans mingled with inferior races.” [The isolated Mongoloids not mentioned.]
> “…a Roman-Judaic [sic!] corruption of the teaching of the Aryan Jesus.”
> “Jews were over-represented not only among Lenin’s willing executioners…” [the Februarists destroyed Russia, not the Octobrists]
> “…the Holocaust of Germans perpetrated, after 1945, by the Allies…” [a cucked joke compared to Generalplan Ost]
> “…it is an extremely pernicious prejudice, because it contradicts and hinders the moral tendency of humanity towards universalist integration and because it turns human values, beginning with truth, into arbitrary facts that express the vital force of race and thus have no substance of their own and can be arbitrarily manipulated for the most violent or heinous ends.” [emphasis mine]
Sublimely stated! The Italian is right here, you know. The anti-rationalist stance, or, better said, pre-rational. For there is no reason without blood – conversely, reason is but a tool to kill foreigners.
P.S. This post has been written with the help of the following song.
P.P.S. On reflection, I must admit I’ve been jaded by all these intellectual debates. There are two groups of thinkers – powerless morons, and morons with power. What’s so bad about Marxism or Islam if they are as equally dishonest as any kitchen philosopher, but also wield strength in material reality? Better amuse oneself with Soloviev than ponder at the idiocy on LessWrong.