All Anglophones are cucks

Ten years have I spent in the fabric of the English cyberspace. And in these ten years, have I constantly felt the solitude of multiculturalism. Partially it stems from my personal peculiarities, my disagreeable and critical character. Yet in large part, this has been the experience of peering through a cultural iron curtain, from a foreign civilisation.

The world of the Anglo is a rootless one. The Anglo is dumb, fat and stupid. He has no erudition, no respect for the state; anarchic squalour is his place. The English-speaker has never looked at the map; countries and continents don’t exist in his braindead Christian mind. The Westerner knows no concept of history or geography, can pronounce no foreign names, the very language is anti-European.

The American denies sovereignty to every nation in Asia, but also to himself. Just like he does not respect or care about his own state, so does he view the foreign land as the domain of the American morality and law. In truth, the Christian never recognises the very existence of varied competing peoples. He only knows America – yet this USA is not a country either, but a world onto itself, a universalist, mindless, barren place beyond time, without borders, without a past, a fake secondary creation.

The Occidental troon of to-day views the whole history as a brain-rotting morality play. He has heard of Hitler, but has no idea what the man was in space and time. Hitler to him is a word to salivate at – Hitler is “evil” to the liberal, Hitler is “good” to the neo-Nazi, but their understanding does not go beyond this childish value judgement. This is what I have had in mind for a long time – a Russian’s attitude is utterly different, for his nation exists, and used to deal with fascism in real battles over real land. The Anglo lives in the Bible.

Or take another example – Byzantium. I am not denying that Americans have perfected their sciences; Western academics will tell you every minute detail about the functioning of the ancient empire, about the battles of the Iconoclasts. What of the knowledgeable normies, however? To the Galilean, Byzantium will be “a Christian stand against Islam”, to the racist neo-Nazi, “a melting-pot mutt land”. But their views will not go beyond a detached, surface-level jumble of facts.

Meanwhile, every Russian knows from the venerated school lessons that their religion and alphabet came from the Greeks; that their princes of old used to take the fight up to Constantinople beyond the sea; that their emperors would later go on to free the Greek people from the Turkish yoke, first in the romantic Corfu expedition of 1799, then in the many Turkish wars over the century; that in the recent times, the Greek patriarch on the CIA-Turkish payroll has severed the Ukraine from the Russian patriarchy. To the Russian, history is a lived experience grounded in reality, not a theoretical exercise.

Coincidentally, modern Americans have such a precise Negro-detector that they have taken a liking to calling Byzantium, historically known as the Greek Empire… as Rome! Isn’t their racial sense of smell incredible? And yet the alt-lightheads will take the Greeks as Aryan – when even the tranny kids know they’re swarthy, and thus take to worship them, by using their amusing endonym, Romaioi.

Or consider this hilarious Twitter blog entry by a gay. It tries to critique America (from a gay position) – yet it lacks any semblance of sentience! The creatura is talking about “war” – even though the planet has been living through the longest peace since the beginning of time, founded upon a nuclear parity of Powers.

This is why I feel much more at home among the insane Marxist reasonings. The Amerimutt lacks any systemic thinking whatever – the Marxist at least has built a concise, coherent, consistent worldview. The Marxist will talk about the dangers of “American imperialism towards the capitalist periphery” – yes, even a Russian Marxist! That said, I am not denying that the Russian does not know true hatred – the Russian is still part of the Aryan race, thus a sick, dying creature. But his words are livelier!

I cannot read Arabic (hello, MemriTV), but it is obvious that in the 1990s the Muslim world had Saddam Hussein, in the 2000s – Usama bin Laden, in the 2010s – Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Every decade keeps on giving great men, believing their adorably schizo religions, yet all firmly grounded in the reality of strife and hatred of things American.

This is why I do not take any Anglophones seriously. All English-speakers are cucks! The racist neo-Nazis are no better – they live in a morality parable likewise, with evil Jews and aethereal Germans. This is what I have always said – even though brother wars must stop when faced with a living foreigner (unlike the year 1914), fratricide itself is part and parcel of survival. The Saxons sold their angelic kin to Roman slavery until the 11th ct. The Hindus and the Moslems are tearing India apart. The Eritreans are murdering their Tigrayan brothers in the name of geopolitical expediency.

Had Americans existed as a nation – or had the neo-Nazis been critiquing this fault of the cosmopolitan American society – they would not have looked upon Hitler as anything other than an arbitrary foreigner, instead taking pride in their own polity and their own history, their leaders, their songs, their language, their empire. But the Anglo is an eternal cuck, the crown of whiteboi evolution! Forever will he latch onto universalist stage-plays full of the ephemeral “Truth”, of the faggy Logos – forever, until his eventual biological extinction. Do you honestly believe Adolf Hitler als Führer Amerikas would not have sought a Lebensraum in the East, via a genocide of the Germans?