> “Christianity in essence, means”
Here Chechar again slanders me – I never put a comma between the subject and the predicate! And until the sodomites banned me from Paediwikia for homophobia, I was removing such commas there as well wherever I went.
This is actually a poignant point. The Russian language is unwieldy, both in orthography/spelling and in punctuation, and Russians neglect their rules all the time. Whereas Anglophones have always impressed me in that they write like machines, exactly the same and with no mistakes – only the kids and the niggers can be confused at times by such cases as its/it’s, your/you’re and they’re/their/there. And of course, in the more arcane aspects of English such as the split infinitive (not to do vs to not do) and “I saw you[r] walking”.
Aside from the comma between the subject and the predicate, that is. I have no idea why this is such a huge issue for the Anglophones.
…Yes, the Red Giant article by Conservative Swede from the 2000s was an eye-opener for me. The strong are considered evil – it’s that simple! It’s that stupid! Take that, Marxists, counting economic power.
Even worse, the Christian Aryans worship weakness, and are actively trying to lose. Just like the GKChP in 1991 – had all the power to execute the traitor Gorbachev, chose to cuck in during their own coup d’état instead! And in America, capitalism always took a secondary place to Christian love – an anti-racist efficient civilisation would still not try actively to undermine their own lawful and high-IQ population stock.
> “Otherwise you’re a fucking neochristian.”
I actually never asked myself whether Dr. Robert Morgan is a Hitlerian (he’s racist, and that’s enough to me). But now I do wonder how his efficient Marxist civilisation can conquer planet Earth. With the strength of its ideas? Hilarious. Genocide is far easier, efficient and lasting.